Timothy Reuben

A Plaintiff Cannot be Compelled to Arbitrate the Threshold Question of Employee Status in a PAGA Claim

Timothy D. Reuben

In Damaris Rosales v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (May 4, 2021) 2021 DJDAR 4243, the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, clarified that a plaintiff asserting a claim for civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.) cannot be compelled to arbitrate the threshold question […]

A Plaintiff Cannot be Compelled to Arbitrate the Threshold Question of Employee Status in a PAGA Claim Read More »

Southern California Record’s “City Sued by Slow-Growth Activists Awards Plaintiffs $100K in Attorney Fees” Article

Reuben Raucher & Blum Managing Principal Timothy D. Reuben is quoted in Southern California Record regarding a recent controversial decision by the Santa Monica City Council to award attorney’s fees to a watchdog group suing the City.

Southern California Record’s “City Sued by Slow-Growth Activists Awards Plaintiffs $100K in Attorney Fees” Article Read More »

Job Applicants Cannot Bring Common Law Tort Actions Against Prospective Employers for “Tameny” Discrimination

Timothy D. Reuben

The Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, recently clarified that a common law tort action under Tameny for employer conduct in violation of public policy requires an employment relationship.  In Williams v. Sacramento River Cats Baseball Club, LLC, 40 Cal. App. 5th 280 (2019), plaintiff Wilfert Williams filed a common law tort action against the

Job Applicants Cannot Bring Common Law Tort Actions Against Prospective Employers for “Tameny” Discrimination Read More »

Court of Appeal Affirms Jury Verdict Because Plaintiffs Presented Prima Facie Case of Whistleblower Retaliation

Timothy D. Reuben

The Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, recently issued an opinion illustrating the burden of proof in a whistleblower retaliation case.  In Hawkins v. City of L.A., 40 Cal. App. 5th 384 (2019), the court affirmed a jury verdict for plaintiff whistleblowers against the City of Los Angeles, finding that the plaintiffs had presented a

Court of Appeal Affirms Jury Verdict Because Plaintiffs Presented Prima Facie Case of Whistleblower Retaliation Read More »

Garcia v. Border Transportation Group: Two Standards, One Issue

Timothy D. Reuben

The Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, recently issued an opinion clarifying the appropriate test for whether or not a person is an “employee” or an “independent contractor” in the context of a wage order claim.  In Garcia v. Border Transportation Group, LLC, 28 Cal. App. 5th 558 (2018), plaintiff Jesus Garcia (“Garcia”) was a

Garcia v. Border Transportation Group: Two Standards, One Issue Read More »

Stephanie I. Blum Selected to the National Academy of Family Law Attorneys (NAFLA)

Reuben Raucher & Blum is proud to announce that Stephanie I. Blum has been selected to the National Academy of Family Law Attorneys (NAFLA), an organization devoted to recognizing the top family law attorneys in the nation. Stephanie joins an elite group of attorneys who have exhibited an extraordinary amount of knowledge, skill, experience, expertise, and success in their practice.

Stephanie I. Blum Selected to the National Academy of Family Law Attorneys (NAFLA) Read More »

9th Circuit Holds Prior Salaries Can Not Be Basis For Pay Differentials Between Male and Female Employees

Timothy D. Reuben

The 9th Circuit decided in Rizo v. Yovino, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 8882, that prior salaries are not “factors other than sex” to justify a pay differential between men and women. In Rizo v. Yovino, The Court, en banc, addressed the application of “prior salaries” as applied to the Equal Pay Act. The plaintiff in

9th Circuit Holds Prior Salaries Can Not Be Basis For Pay Differentials Between Male and Female Employees Read More »